Archive for Collaboration

It’s tough enough getting people to collaborate effectively within/across teams because of this little sticking point called “people behaviors” that’s oftentimes overlooked, but now we’re facing yet another collaboration challenge playing out before us ~ the Baby Boomer, Gen X and Millennial “Great Divide”. And let’s not kid ourselves into thinking that the Great Divide doesn’t exist because the facts and anecdotal data prove otherwise. 

If you’re a Baby Boomer (born 1946-1964), just take 10 minutes and have a heart-to-heart talk with a Gen X’er (born 1965-1979) or Millennial (born 1980-1999) who you have a trusted relationship with, and REALLY LISTEN to what they have to say. Based on my work with clients as we’re proactively tackling the Great Divide… 

Gen X’ers are irritated that Baby Boomers are blocking their way to advancement. Baby Boomers aren’t retiring for a variety of reasons. They’re maintaining their key leadership position stronghold. To further exacerbate the situation, a portion of the Baby Boomers in key leadership positions are behaving as “lame ducks”, to put it bluntly. That bad behavior would aggravate any top performer regardless of when he/she was born. 

Millennials on the other hand, are irritated with Baby Boomers because they’re not effectively engaging Millennials in key areas: 

  • Connecting on a human-to-human basis
  • Understanding what motivates Millennials
  • Providing 1×1 value-add, real-time mentoring, coaching and feedback
  • Working with Millennials to create career paths
  • Communicating with Millennials using engaging technologies (e.g., social networks, IM, Twitter, Smart Phones)
  • Supporting Millennials’ work/life balance needs  
  • Creating sustainable virtual teams (which, by the way, save companies HUGE quantifiable dollars plus increase productivity if thoughtfully planned and implemented)

And what do Gen X’ers and Millennials have in common? First, both groups are loyal to people but not to organizations, which means…Baby Boomers, you must genuinely connect with both groups in order to engage and optimize their potential AND retain them! Second, both groups are turned off by Baby Boomers who place monetary-driven (greed-driven) personal, company and shareholder agendas before “the good of humanity.” Baby Boomers, you’re still holding key leadership positions and you’re highly influential, so you can start setting a different tone within your organizations and teams by actively weaving in meaningful opportunities that support “the greater good”.    

So what’s the business case that would compel organizations and teams to address the Great Divide? First, some statistics. Although estimates vary by source, roughly 70 million and 48 million comprise the Millennial and Gen X U.S. workforces respectively, or 118 million collectively, compared to 70+ million Baby Boomers. It’s official ~ Baby Boomers, you’re in the cultural minority. It’s no longer about “you”. I can say this because I too, am a Baby Boomer. But reasons to tackle the Great Divide go beyond that:  

  • Baby Boomers owe it to the next generation of leaders and to society to position Gen X’ers and Millennials for success. That’s what genuine leaders do. They take action based on the big picture and the greater good.
 
  • For every Millennial that quits, and they will quit if their key needs are not being met, expect turnover costs to soar. For a company that employs 5,000 with a $50K average annual salary and annual turnover rate of 10% and cost of 50% (turnover costs can range from 50%-150%), reducing turnover by just 3% can save the company $3.75 million annually ($8.75 million vs. $12.5 million).
 
  • For every Millennial and Gen X’er that doesn’t feel engaged, the person is operating at some percent less than 100%. Using the previous example and assuming 2,080 planned annual hours per employee, if 20% of the workforce is operating at 80%, the productivity drain is roughly 416K hours or $10+ million annually, which means that 200 FTE’s (full time equivalents) are showing up for work, are on your payroll and contributing a BIG ZERO to the bottom line. And let’s not forget that unproductive employees slow down productive employees, so the productivity drain will grow vs. shrink if ignored.          

One last tip – don’t refer to a Gen X’er or Millennial by these two or other common generational names. Although Baby Boomers aren’t typically offended by their generational title, the same is not true for those generations that follow. Another cultural difference!   

How are you tackling the Great Divide? Please share your comments with us!

Happy Monday from everyone here at TechEdge LLC!  We have some great news to share. Our president, Gwen Walsh, has been elected to STEMout’s board of directors.  The following is an excerpt from today’s press release:

STEMout announces that Gwen Walsh, President of TechEdge LLC, has been elected to their board of directors. “Gwen is doing a terrific job at advising and guiding her clients so they may reach their greatest potential, and as such, we are looking forward to her contributions as a member of STEMout’s board of directors,” said Katie Jagusch, STEMout Board President. “We think Gwen’s insights, leadership experience and technology credentials will be very valuable in helping to guide STEMout in the years ahead!”

“STEMout is one of those amazing organizations that I truly admire because they inspire youths to choose STEM careers and are helping us shape our youth’s future,” said Gwen Walsh. “I’m really looking forward to working with Katie and STEMout’s board to help with STEMout’s impactful outreach program!”

STEMout Inc. was founded in 2010 with the sole mission of increasing science, technology, engineering, and mathematic career-path awareness among students. For more information on outreach or STEM Squads, please visit www.STEMout.org.

What a great way to kick off the week.  Congratulations, Gwen!

Coaching Question: What is the distinction between being “collaborative” and “manipulative”? 

We define collaboration as “the mutual engagement of participants in a coordinated effort to achieve a common end goal.” When building and nurturing relationships, we look for the following integrity-driven behaviors: 

  • Honorable and genuine intentions
  • Collaborative spirit
  • Company agenda advancement
  • Add value and give first
  • Transparency
  • Long term, mutually beneficial

The definition of manipulation is “to change by artful or unfair means so as to serve one’s purpose.” (Merriam-Webster) The clues that we look for that point to less than integrity-driven behaviors would be:

  • Dishonorable and disingenuous intentions
  • Exploitative bent
  • Personal/hidden agenda advancement
  • Take first
  • Opacity/opaqueness
  • Short term, personally beneficial

One of the best ways to determine if a person is characteristically collaborative or manipulative is to objectively observe his/her behavior during some type of conflict. Among other behaviors, a collaborative person will listen intently to the other party, seek to understand the other person’s point of view and invite feedback when advocating a point. Under no circumstances will an authentic collaborator initiate or engage in behavior that causes harm to the other party.

A manipulative person may initially appear to be genuinely interested in the other person’s point of view, but before too long, the manipulator applies one or more of the following tactics1

   
TACTIC MANIPULATOR BEHAVIOR
Denial Refuses to admit that they’ve done something harmful or hurtful when they clearly have
Selective Inattention “Plays dumb” or acts oblivious
Rationalization Offers an excuse for engaging in inappropriate or harmful behaviors
Diversion Changes the subject
Misrepresenting the Truth Presents deception as truth
Intimidation Creates self-doubt, anxiousness and submission through guilt tripping and shaming
Playing the Victim Portrays self as innocent to gain sympathy, evoke compassion and get what they want
Vilifying the Victim Tries to make the other person feel like “the bad guy”
Playing the Servant Role Cloaks self-serving agendas in the guise of service to a more noble cause
Seduction Charms, praises, flatters or overtly supports others to get them to loosen their defenses
Projecting Blame Shifts blame for aggressive behavior
Minimization Denies and rationalizes their behavior
   

1In Sheep’s Clothing: Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People, George K. Simon, PhD.  

Please share your comments and coaching questions with us!